Review Open Access Logo

Human In Vitro and Ex Vivo Models in Angiogenesis Research: Advances and Challenges

Maisarah Md Razmi 1, 2 ORCID logo
Azizah Ugusman 2, 3
Nadiah Sulaiman 2, 4
Mohd Faizal Ahmad 5
Safa Abdul-Ghani 6
Muhammad Ishamuddin Ismail 2, 7
Nur Najmi Mohamad Anuar 1, 2, *
  1. Programme of Biomedical Science, Centre for Toxicology & Health Risk Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
  2. Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research Group (CardioResp), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
  3. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
  4. Centre for Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Tunku Mukhriz Chancellor Hospital, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
  5. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Tunku Mukhriz Chancellor Hospital, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
  6. Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
  7. Heart and Lung Centre, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
Correspondence to: Nur Najmi Mohamad Anuar, Programme of Biomedical Science, Centre for Toxicology & Health Risk Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia; Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research Group (CardioResp), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia. Email: [email protected].
Volume & Issue: Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025) | Page No.: 7304-7319 | DOI: 10.15419/bmrat.v12i4.972
Published: 2025-04-30

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • HTML Views: 1759
  • PDF Views: 369
  • XML Views: 119

Statistics from Dimensions

This article is published with open access by BioMedPress. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. 

Abstract

Angiogenesis, the process of new blood vessel formation, is a complex phenomenon that plays a crucial role in various physiological and pathological processes, including embryonic development, tissue repair, vascular homeostasis, and tumor microenvironments. The utilization of human in vitro and ex vivo models to study angiogenesis is an actively investigated area that holds great promise for offering novel insights and prospects for developing methods to treat angiogenesis-related diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disorders. Combining in vitro and ex vivo models using human samples can enhance the understanding of the complex process of angiogenesis in the human body. This integrative strategy facilitates a holistic exploration of angiogenesis, bridging the gap between simplified in vitro systems and the complexities inherent in in vivo settings, thereby augmenting the translational prospects of research outcomes for clinical applications. However, ethical constraints, inherent individual variability in human samples, challenges in obtaining tissue samples, technical issues in tissue handling, and the high cost involved are key limitations to consider.

Introduction

Angiogenesis is the process of forming new capillaries from pre-existing blood vessels and plays a pivotal role in various normal physiological processes, including embryonic growth, tissue repair, and the maintenance of vascular homeostasis1. While pathological angiogenesis has traditionally been associated with oncology, recent advancements in angiogenesis research have also influenced the treatment of non-malignant conditions in fields such as ophthalmology, cardiology, and gynecology2. The historical development of angiogenesis research gained interest in the 1970s, primarily due to the pioneering work of Judah Folkman. The study stated that tumors could be inhibited by targeting their blood supply, leading to the hypothesis that angiogenesis was a crucial factor in tumor growth. His early experiments laid the groundwork for the development of various angiogenesis assays that were essential for understanding the mechanisms of blood vessel formation in both health and disease3. Understanding the mechanisms that control angiogenesis and its regulation is crucial for developing successful therapeutic interventions and evaluating potential drug candidates.

Angiogenesis assays can be used to assess the pro- or anti-angiogenic effects of endogenous or exogenous stimuli by measuring their effects in , , and methods using samples from either animals or humans4. Generally, techniques focus on different phases of the angiogenesis process and are utilized for initial evaluations, while techniques more closely replicate natural conditions to provide more relevant data4. models of angiogenesis, including vascular explant cultures, are becoming more prominent because they overcome limitations encountered by techniques and simplify the complexity found in models5. Recent advancements in human model systems, including organ-on-a-chip technologies and 3D bioprinting, have significantly enhanced the study of angiogenesis. These models allow for a more accurate representation of human physiology, addressing some limitations of conventional animal models. For instance, human endothelial cells can be cultured in 3D matrices that mimic the extracellular environment, thereby facilitating a better understanding of angiogenesis mechanisms in human tissues6.

Therefore, this review article focuses on the use of human samples that are currently most often employed to study angiogenesis through and methods. The information gathered aims to provide deeper insights into the use of humanized models in improving the translational potential of angiogenesis research, allowing researchers to study the effects of angiogenic factors in a context that closely resembles human biology. The shift toward human-centric models has been pivotal in identifying novel therapeutic targets and enhancing the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies.

Angiogenesis Assay

Angiogenesis assays are experimental techniques designed to evaluate various aspects of blood vessel formation and serve as essential tools in angiogenesis research4. These assays provide critical insights into the complex mechanisms underlying angiogenesis, enabling researchers to investigate the effects of different chemicals, growth factors, and genetic alterations on blood vessel development4. Below is an overview of and methodologies employed in previous studies related to angiogenic diseases.

Angiogenesis Assay

models involve cultivating isolated tissue components of an organ while maintaining certain features of the environment. The primary goal of models in research and medicine is to reduce experimental variables by isolating various organ components or structures for study in regulated, reproducible, and easily evaluated circumstances7. models of angiogenesis mainly focus on endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation in response to angiogenic stimuli. Table 1 shows the comparison of the method and provides a summary for better understanding.

Figure 1

Workflow of spheroid formation using ultra-low-attachment plates. Cells are first dissociated into a single-cell suspension and seeded into an ultra-low-attachment plate. The plate is incubated at 37°C to facilitate cell aggregation. Over time, cells aggregate and compact into a uniform spheroid structure.

Figure 2

Schematic representation of an organ-on-a-chip (OOAC) microfluidic model. The OOAC platform utilizes microfluidic channels (red and blue lines) to simulate the vascular and tissue compartments of human organs. These channels can be lined with endothelial and supporting cell types to mimic blood vessels and surrounding tissues. The design enables dynamic flow, cell-cell interactions, and tissue-specific microenvironments, making it an effective tool for studying angiogenesis and other physiological processes.

Table 1

Lists of the in vitro angiogenesis assays

Type of in vitro assays

Methods

References

Endothelial cell proliferation assay

The effects of pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic substances on proliferation can be evaluated using direct cell counts, DNA synthesis, or metabolic activities. Cell proliferation is commonly assessed by a colorimetric technique.

MTT:

- Seed the cells in 96-well plates for 24 hours and treat with test compound.

- Change the medium for the next day and add 10 µL of MTT reagent. Incubate the plates for 3-5 hours at 37oC.

- Remove media and add 100 µl of DMSO. Incubate for 15 minutes and then read absorbance at 570 nm.

- Mitochondrial enzymes convert MTT into the formazan dye in correlation with the number of cells. MTT is a yellow tetrazole compound that is transformed into purple formazan in living cells, and its colour absorbance may be measured using a spectrophotometer.

Other than MTT, BrdU also can be utilized for DNA cell labelling, followed by cell analysis employing colorimetry, chemiluminescence, or fluorescence detection

8, 9

Endothelial cell migration assay

Cell migration is the movement of cells in response to external biochemical cues. One way to detect the migration process is the scratch wound assay.

- Seed the cell in the well plate and incubate until confluency reached 90%.

- Scrap the cells by using 200 µl pipettes tip or cell scrapper. Wash the cell-plate with PBS to remove the floating cells.

- Add the media with treatment and observe the wound area using inverted microscope.

This approach is used to measure fundamental cell migration properties in terms of speed, persistence, and polarity.

8, 10

Tube formation assay

Commonly used in vitro to assess angiogenic characteristics by observing the creation of tubular structures from endothelial cells

A common method for studying tube formation is to culture HUVECs on Matrigel and observe the branching structures within 12 to 24 hours.

11

Spheroid-based assay

Enable to investigate the effects of drug or genetic manipulations on sprouting angiogenesis in a fast and robust manner.

Cells will be harvested and seed cells in ultra-low-attachment plate to promote spheroid formation as shown in Figure 1. After checking the assay uniformity and reproducibility, downstream application could be proceeded.

This assay better reflects in vivo angiogenesis than other well-known in vitro angiogenesis assays, such as the 2D tube formation on Matrigel, due to the formation of complex cell-cell interactions and gradients that are crucial for studying angiogenesis.

12, 13, 14

Organ-On-A-Chip Models

The organ on a chip (OOAC) is a cutting-edge in vitro microscale biomimetic platform capable of recreating the physiological environments of human organs. OOAC is a novel in-vitro micro-scale biomimetic platform that helps in reproducing physiological environment of human organs. This technology involves cell biology, engineering and material sciences to simulate in-vivo tissues.

The initial stage of this process involves designing and creating the microfluidic chip of organ on a chip models (Figure 2) to mimic the cellular structure and surroundings of the desired organ or tissue. The chip used for researching angiogenesis may have endothelial cell-lined channels that imitate blood arteries, along with other cell types such pericytes, smooth muscle cells, and extracellular matrix components.

There are several micro-fabrication methods that had been introduced such as photolithography, soft lithography, 3D printing and computer numerical code micro milling.

Type of microarchitectures that can be used in micro engineered chips such as single layer microfluids device, 3D compartmentalization, microfluidic vascular networks.

6, 15

Angiogenesis Assay

refers to experiments performed on tissue or organs extracted from a living organism and conducted outside the original biological context16. In scientific research, methodologies allow for experimentation in a controlled laboratory environment while maintaining conditions that closely mimic those found within organisms. Tissues may be removed in various ways, including whole organs or parts of tissue16. Unlike , which typically involves isolated cells or tissues cultured in controlled environments, studies utilize living cells or tissues taken directly from an organism. This distinction allows experiments to retain more of the natural architecture and metabolic processes of the tissue, making them more representative of conditions17. models have become increasingly important in various fields, including disease modeling, drug discovery, and regenerative medicine, as they bridge the gap between simpler assays and more complex studies. Table 2 shows the list of angiogenesis assays that have been conducted in previous studies.

Figure 3

Overview of the aortic ring assay method. Collagen is added to a well plate and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C and then aorta samples from mice or rat is dissected, washed, and cut into small sections. Each aortic ring is placed on the gel at the center of the well, followed by the addition of a second gel layer over the ring. The bottom panel shows a representative image of aortic culture sprouting (indicated by red arrows) captured under 4x magnification using an inverted microscope. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Table 2

Lists of ex vivo angiogenesis assays

Types of ex vivo angiogenesis assay

Methods

References

Aortic ring assay

This assay facilitates the growth of angiogenic vessels originating from a section of the aorta when cultured within a three-dimensional matrix, such as collagen or fibrin gels.Figure 3 shown the overview of the aortic ring assay method.

5

Tissue explant assay

A technique involving the isolation and ex vivo cultivation of tissue fragments while maintaining their native cellular architecture and interactions. Upon isolation, the explants are embedded in extracellular matrix gels to maintain their three-dimensional structure and support the angiogenic processes.

18

Figure 4

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were isolated from human umbilical cords using an enzymatic digestion technique. (A) A segment of cord measuring 5-10 cm in length was used for HUVEC isolation. (B) The image highlights the anatomical location of the vein within the umbilical cord. (C) HUVECs, observed under a light microscope at a 100 µm scale, display their characteristic cobblestone morphology, essential for studies in angiogenesis.

Human models in angiogenesis assays

angiogenesis models are essential tools for studying the intricate processes of blood vessel creation in a controlled laboratory environment19. By using human endothelial cells and other relevant supporting cell types, these models enable researchers to investigate the spatial and temporal aspects of angiogenesis, understand the signaling pathways in vascular development, and test substances that could promote or inhibit angiogenesis20. Endothelial cells, once considered merely a basic blood vessel lining, are now acknowledged as a highly dynamic tissue that significantly contributes to various physiological and pathological processes21. Below are several types of human endothelial cell samples that have been utilized in angiogenesis research.

Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)

HUVECs serve as a valuable model for researching vascular endothelium features and key biological pathways related to endothelial function22. They are frequently utilized in research because they are easily isolated from the human umbilical cord, readily available, and their behavior is well-documented 22. Figure 4 shows an example of the morphology of HUVECs and the umbilical cord that was dissected to isolate HUVECs. In addition, HUVECs have the capacity to accurately represent the human vascular endothelium. This is consistent with the results of Lau .23, who evaluated HUVECs and human umbilical artery endothelial cells (HUAEC) as models for cardiovascular research. Their study showed that both cell types displayed comparable features in terms of cell viability, metabolic activity, and membrane integrity, indicating that both cell types are equally appropriate for cardiovascular research. HUVECs are commonly used to investigate angiogenesis and its associated disorders24. Many studies have utilized HUVECs to explore the molecular processes related to blood vessel formation, such as endothelial cell migration, growth, and branching25.

Moreover, HUVECs are a useful model for researching vascular illnesses such as atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and endothelial dysfunction26. In earlier studies, they were utilized to replicate disease conditions in a laboratory setting to explore the fundamental mechanisms involved in vascular pathology. The HUVEC model is valuable for studying how hemodynamic forces affect the endothelium and the development of atherosclerotic plaques. This model enables researchers to subject endothelial cells to shear stress under controlled flow conditions, replicating blood flow conditions in living organisms22. The HUVEC model has proven valuable for investigating various biological processes and disorders, including inflammation, apoptosis, preeclampsia, cardiovascular diseases, and regenerative medicine22, 27.

Nevertheless, one of the primary limitations of HUVECs is their unsuitability for long-term investigations22. HUVECs typically have a lifespan of around 10 passages, although some researchers suggest that these cells may lose their original features and responsiveness to stimuli after passage 622. HUVECs may not be suitable for vascularizing specific tissues, such as neurological tissue, which requires a tightly sealed endothelium and an effective blood-brain barrier28, 29. Furthermore, as the human umbilical cord is fetal rather than maternal tissue, the fetal gender must be considered, as it might yield different results in metabolite levels and oxidative stress29. While HUVECs are commonly used in vascular biology research due to their ease of isolation and culture, they may not fully represent the phenotypic response of adult-derived endothelial cells30. This is because HUVECs are fetal cells and may not accurately reflect the characteristics and behavior of endothelial cells found in adult tissues. These limitations highlight the need to consider the specific requirements of each application when choosing endothelial cell types for research.

Human Aortic Endothelial Cells (HAECs)

HAECs are commonly derived from the inner lining of the aorta, a major artery responsible for transporting oxygen-rich blood from the heart to the body. These cells can be sourced from various segments of the aorta, such as the ascending aorta (proximal to the heart) or the descending aorta (distal from the heart)31. The specific site of HAEC isolation may vary based on the research methodology or experimental design. HAECs are typically procured from explants of healthy human heart donors through surgical procedures or post-mortem tissue donations32. Samples containing the aortic endothelial layer are harvested, and endothelial cells are extracted and cultured in laboratory settings for further analysis and experimentation32. The collection and utilization of human tissue samples for research purposes are governed by ethical guidelines and regulatory approvals33.

HAECs offer an excellent model system for investigating various aspects of cardiovascular function and disease, such as atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction caused by different stressors34, 35. HAECs can be employed to evaluate changes in the vascular endothelium and its function at a preclinical stage, which holds potential for refining therapeutic strategies. In addition, HAECs have been found to exhibit robust angiogenic potential in 3D microfluidic angiogenesis systems, which is critical for investigating vessel formation and regeneration36. It was also reported that HAECs exhibit similar cellular characteristics to HUVECs in a 2D culture system37. The study of HAECs in laboratory settings has significantly contributed to our understanding of endothelial physiology and the pathogenesis of vascular diseases.

While cell cultures provide insight into the interactions of endothelial cells with diverse mediators, it is essential to acknowledge their inherent limitations, particularly regarding the uncertainty of translatability to human physiological contexts. Like other endothelial cell types, HAECs may undergo alterations upon extraction from their native human environments. This is primarily due to the absence of the intricate intercellular communications observed within the living organism, which cannot be fully captured via assays38. Furthermore, HAECs demonstrate variability according to factors such as donor age, health status, and genetic background, which could influence the consistency and reliability of research outcomes32. In contrast to utilizing immortalized endothelial cell lines or cells from more accessible sources like the human umbilical vein, isolating, culturing, and maintaining primary HAECs necessitate a more complicated and expensive process involving the acquisition of human heart donors through surgical procedures or post-mortem tissue donations32.

Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells (HCAECs)

HCAECs are considered a dynamic organ exhibiting secretory, metabolic, and immune functions beyond their main role in modulating nutrient translocation across the vascular wall. HCAECs are specifically involved in the secretion of various vasoactive substances that regulate vascular smooth muscle tone and blood flow within the coronary arteries39. HCAECs originate from the coronary arteries of the human heart40, and they can be obtained from individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)41. Notably, most studies employ commercially available HCAECs purchased from authorized companies, such as Promocell (Germany) or Lonza (USA)42, 43. As indicated by these providers, primary HCAECs can be isolated not only from the main coronary arteries but also from their respective branches, including the right and left coronary artery, anterior descending, and circumflex branches, from a single donor. As these cells originate from human coronary arteries, they play a pivotal role in supplying oxygenated blood to the heart muscle and therefore are ideally suited for investigating the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease and developing innovative therapies39. Moreover, according to Lakota .43, HCAECs exhibit unique sensitivities and responses compared to endothelial cells derived from other vascular beds, as HCAECs were shown to have sensitivity to tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-induced expression of adhesion molecules compared to HUVECs and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HMVECs).

However, the considerable heterogeneity and organ-specific characteristics of HCAECs pose challenges in result interpretation and study reproducibility. This means that HCAECs might not be fully representative of the behavior of endothelial cells from other vascular beds, potentially resulting in inconclusive or inaccurate findings44. A study by Wagner .45 also emphasized that HCAECs were the only cells expressing spike protein post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating distinct responses compared to other endothelial cells, such as HUVECs, HMECs, and human pulmonary arterial cells. This suggests that observations in HCAECs may not fully capture the responses of endothelial cells from diverse vascular beds or under varying pathological conditions. Besides that, the variability among donors can also affect the behavior and reactivity of HCAECs . Donor-related factors, such as age, sex, genetic background, and health status, may influence angiogenic responses, contributing to variability in experimental results46, 47. Obtaining HCAEC samples can be intricate, involving procurement from patient donors or acquisition from authorized companies with legal consent, potentially incurring higher costs41, 43.

Isolating human endothelial cells from the primary organ and culturing the cells might cause the loss of complexity of the organ structure48. Thus, angiogenesis assays play a key role in exploring the complex interaction between molecular and cellular elements in angiogenic processes under controlled experimental settings49. Among the various assays available, human sample models hold particular importance due to their direct relevance to human physiology and disease. By utilizing human tissues and cells, these models provide a more accurate representation of the physiological conditions and responses to human angiogenesis50. Below are several types of human samples that have been utilized in angiogenesis research.

Human Saphenous Vein (HSV)

HSV have been previously utilized in assays. These veins are located beneath the skin and contain valves that prevent blood backflow, playing a crucial role in transporting deoxygenated blood from the leg to the heart51. Interestingly, HSVs are widely employed as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting52. According to the literature, HSVs have been extensively utilized in tissue culture investigations, particularly for modeling intimal hyperplasia and exploring the causes of vein graft failure in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)53. In the context of angiogenesis research, as indicated in Table 3, most researchers have cultured saphenous veins by embedding them in a gel to observe sprouting formation. Conversely, there is limited specific mention of tissue cultures in previous angiogenesis studies that used other veins, including the human umbilical vein.

Table 3

Previous studies that utilized human saphenous veins (HSVs) in research related to angiogenesis.

Related Angiogenesis Study

Methods

References

Su-PAR trigger endothelial cell signaling leading to new vessel formation

through its chemotactic Ser88-Arg-Ser-Arg-Tyr92 sequence

- 48-well plates were covered with 200 µl of Matrigel.

- 2-3 mm of the long cross section was placed on the gel after the gel has polymerized and another 200 µl of Matrigel was added to cover the tissue.

- The ring was cultured with 1 ml of complete media growth (EBM)

54

Effect of thalidomide in antiangiogenic activity

- The vein was cut into 2 mm long cross sections.

- A 12-well plate was covered with 250 µl of Matrigel and then the tissue was placed onto the polymerized gel. Another 250 µl of Matrigel was used to cover the tissue.

- The tissue was cultured in 2 ml (endothelial cell growth media) EGM-2 medium for 24 hours before treatment.

- The media was removed after 24 hr and replaced with 1 ml endothelial basal media (EBM) with 2% FBS and 10 ug/mL gentamicin.

- Photographed on day 5.

55

Diminished venous endothelial Eph-B4 expression is associated with an angiogenic and mitogenic phenotype

- A segment of adult human saphenous vein was used in the flow model.

- Veins were inspected for feasibility of incorporation into the bioreactor, and structural parameters were measured.

56

Function of PDE10A in SMC proliferation and intimal hyperplasia

- The vein was cut into 0.5 cm lengths.

- Cultured with luminal surface in a 12-well plate with RPMI 1640 medium containing 15% of FBS.

52

Vinpocetine suppress pathological vascular remodeling

- The vein was cut into 0.5 cm sections.

- The segments were pinned onto a Mersilene mesh with luminal surface in 12-well plates in RPMI 1640 medium with 30% FBS and other supplements including antibiotics. The tissue was cultured for 7 days

57

Human artery

The human arterial ring assay is an innovative system for the 3D study of angiogenesis. Arterial explants for angiogenesis studies can be obtained from various sources, such as aortic tissue, choroid, epididymis, and skeletal muscle. Aortic explants are able to form branching microvessels when embedded in an extracellular matrix58. Table 4 shows a list of previous reports that utilized human artery explants in ex vivo angiogenesis studies.

Table 4

Previous ex vivo angiogenesis studies using human arterial explants

Artery explants

Angiogenesis-related study

Methods

References

Umbilical cord

Human tumor angiogenesis

- Human arterial rings assay.

- Arterial rings were placed on 48-well cell culture dishes pre-coated with 100 µl of basement membrane extract (BME) and overlaid with 100 µl of BME.

- Maximum growth velocity achieved at 14 days.

59

Umbilical cord

Kisspeptin-10 roles inhibiting angiogenesis in human blood vessels

- Vessels were cut into 1 mm sections.

- The vessel ring was embedded in Matrigel (200 µl) and were cultured for 2-3 days with media consisting of 10% FBS.

60

Temporal artery biopsy

Giant cell arteritis

- Cultured in Matrigel for 5 days in 96 well plate.

61

Human umbilical cord

Identification of new genes regulating sprouting, screening pro and anti-angiogenic drugs, biomarkers and analysis of tumor microenvironmental effects on vessel formation

- Artery was cut into 30 1-2 mm sections and placed inside a 48-well plate that was precoated with 100 µl of BME gel.

- Cultured for 18 days with media consisting of 5% FBS.

62

Human Mesenteric arteries

Age-associated deterioration in angiogenesis, blood flow and glucose homeostasis by therapeutically targeting CD47

- Arterial ring assay by cutting the vessel into 1 mm sections.

- Embedded with Matrigel with cell media.

- Incubated the tissue for 15 days.

63

Human Retinal Explant

Excess angiogenesis also contributes to the pathogenesis of various ocular illnesses, including diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and retinopathy of prematurity64. Table 5 shows the usage of human retinal tissues used to investigate retina-related angiogenesis illnesses. Based on our literature search, there are only a small number of previous reports that used human retinal explants in angiogenesis studies. This might be due to the difficulty in obtaining donor eyes and the high level of competence required for retina manipulation, which may not be feasible with small samples65.

Table 5

Previous studies carried out ex vivo angiogenesis assays using human retinal explants.

Retina explant

Methods

References

Choroidal tissues

- Human choroidal explants were cultured in normal medium for 5 days for neovessel growth and undergo treatment.

64

Human iris

- Whole iris fragments were cut into 3 mm diameter segments and embedded with Matrigel in a 24-well plate.

- The tissue explants were cultured with ECGM for 48 hours.

66

Choroidal explant

- Choroidal sprouting assay was conducted by embedding the samples with Matrigel in 24 well plate.

- The samples were incubated for 1 day and continued with treatment.

- The sprout image was captured at day 5.

67

Human retinal explants

- Each of the tissue explant was cut in to 4 mm diameter segments.

- Then, the tissues were placed on top of a gel matrix.

- The tissues were observed from day 2 to day 15.

68

Clinical Research in Angiogenic Therapies

Clinical trials and research have led to the development of various effective anti-angiogenic treatments, such as bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors like sorafenib, and human recombinant endostatin. These advancements indicate the potential of targeting angiogenesis for therapeutic purposes, particularly in the context of cancer diseases69. In addition, numerous clinical trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of VEGF therapy for ischemic coronary and peripheral arterial disease (Table 6), which showed potential therapeutic benefits despite the low significance. The findings from human models in angiogenesis assays have significant implications for clinical practice, particularly in the development of therapeutic strategies for various diseases. By utilizing human-derived models, researchers can gain insights that are more directly applicable to patient care.

Angiogenesis assays have become significant tools in the discovery of anti-angiogenic drugs for cancer treatment. Identification of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as an important regulator of angiogenesis led to the development of bevacizumab (Avastin), which is a monoclonal antibody that suppresses VEGF70. Preclinical studies of angiogenesis with human endothelial cells revealed that bevacizumab was capable of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis, thereby supporting its clinical use. Clinical trials have shown that bevacizumab, when used together with chemotherapy, enhances outcomes for several malignancies, including osteosarcoma70. The successful translation of angiogenesis testing results into the clinic underlines the value of these models in developing effective therapies for cancer patients. Aside from cancer treatment, angiogenic therapies have also been used in clinical trials for retinal and ischemic diseases. Table 6 shows previous studies that conducted clinical trials associated with angiogenic agent targets.

Table 6

Clinical trials on various angiogenic therapies

Angiogenic therapy target

Study design (Disease; Time; Drugs; Dose; Number of patients; Phase)

Outcomes

References

VEGFR inhibitor

Advanced renal cell cancer; Axitinib + pembrolizumab; 5mg + 2 mg/kg; 6 weeks; n = 52; Phase 1b

The treatment combination of axitinib + pembrolizumab is tolerable and shows promising antitumour activity in patients with treatment-naive advanced renal cell carcinoma

No unexpected toxicities were observed

94% of patients experienced some degree of tumour shrinkage.

71

VEGF

Osteosarcoma; 29 weeks; Bevacizumab + MAP; 15 mg/kg; n = 3; Phase II

4-year EFS rate: 57.5% ± 10.0%

Overall survival rate: 83.4% ± 7.8%

28%evaluable patients had good histologic response (<5% viable tumor) to preoperative chemotherapy.

70

VEGF inhibitor

Branch retinal vein occlusion; 12 months; dexamethasone & ranibizumab; 0.7 mg (dexamethasone) & 0.5 mg (ranibizumab); n = 307

Dexamethasone and ranibizumab improved best-corrected visual acuity and anatomical outcomes.

Dexamethasone did not show non-interiority to ranibizumab

Dexamethasone associated with increased risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract pressure

72

VEGF

Angina; 0,3 and 12 months; AdVEGF-DΔNΔC (AdVEGF-D) or placebo (control) groups; 200 µL at 10 sites; n = 30

Shown significant increase in myocardial perfusion at 3 months and 12 months compared to baseline.

73

VEGFR inhibitor

Hepatocellular carcinoma; 4 weeks; oral dovitinib; 500 mg (5 days on & 2 days off); n = 24; phase II

Overall response rate was 48%, including 13% complete remission

Time to progression: 16.8 months

Overall survival: 34.8 months

74

BMSC

Critical limb ischemia; over 12 months; stempeucel®; 2 million cells/kg body weigh; n = 24; Phase III

Showed statistically significant reduction in rest pain and ulcer size (healing of ulcer) as compared to baseline.

Increased the blood flow to the ischemic limbs as ABPI and ASP increased.

75

Limitations of Using Human Models in Angiogenesis Assays

Angiogenesis denotes the intricate process of forming new blood vessels, a pivotal aspect of human physiological functions. Utilizing human models in studying angiogenesis yields significant outcomes for diseases associated with this process. Nonetheless, the study of angiogenesis through human models is not devoid of limitations due to various factors. Firstly, ethical constraints emerge as a prominent issue. The ethical framework governing research involving human subjects underscores fundamental principles, including respect for individuals and associated responsibilities mandated by justice, whereas regulations concerning research involving animal subjects primarily focus on limited considerations of welfare76. Other than that, human samples can show inherent individual variability in terms of genetic differences, health conditions, and age-related factors. These factors might add complexity and variability to the study outcomes65. Obtaining human tissue samples for angiogenesis assays can also pose challenges, particularly when considering specific tissues or disease conditions, resulting in limitations in sample size and study replication65. Working with human samples also involves high costs due to various factors, including sample collection, processing, and storage77. Due to the limited availability of human samples from donors, most researchers are forced to purchase samples from a small number of established companies, such as Promocell (Germany) or Lonza (USA)42. All these limitations and issues must be carefully considered by researchers before embarking on their angiogenesis-related research.

Future Direction of Using Human Models in Angiogenesis Assay

Currently, the development of human model technologies in the angiogenesis research field has shown potential for enhancing our understanding and for developing new therapeutics. Models such as organ-on-a-chip systems, 3D bioprinted tissues, and culture have the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional in vitro and in vivo assays by offering more accurate and physiologically relevant platforms for studying angiogenesis. As these technologies evolve, they can enhance the precision of drug testing. For example, organ-on-a-chip systems allow for the precise control of the cellular microenvironment6. By incorporating human endothelial cells and other supporting cell types, organ-on-a-chip devices can be used to study angiogenesis in the context of specific organ systems, such as the brain, heart, or kidney6. These models can provide valuable insights into the role of angiogenesis in organ development, homeostasis, and disease pathogenesis. 3D bioprinting technology also allows for the precise deposition of cells, biomaterials, and growth factors to create complex, tissue-like structures. By incorporating human endothelial cells and supporting cell types into 3D bioprinted constructs, researchers can develop highly customizable angiogenesis assays that mimic the native extracellular matrix and cellular microenvironment78. Additionally, CRISPR can be used to create patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with disease-relevant genetic mutations, which can then be differentiated into endothelial cells and used to develop personalized angiogenesis assays24. As these emerging technologies continue to advance, they will likely play an increasingly important role in angiogenesis research. By providing more accurate and physiologically relevant human models, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex mechanisms of angiogenesis, identify novel therapeutic targets, and develop more effective treatments for angiogenesis-related diseases.

Conclusion

It is important to understand the development of the vascular system and the mechanisms that lead to vascular diseases in order to discover new, effective treatments. Combining and models using human samples offers a comprehensive approach to studying angiogenesis. This integrative strategy bridges the gap between simplified systems and the complex realities of conditions, enhancing the translational potential of research findings. However, key challenges remain, including ethical considerations, variability in human samples, difficulties in tissue sample acquisition, and the cost of obtaining samples. Addressing these challenges is critical for advancing the field. Therefore, collaboration with ethical boards and regulatory agencies to establish clear, standardized guidelines for the use of human tissues in angiogenesis research can help streamline the approval process and ensure that research is conducted in a manner that respects donor rights. By utilizing large-scale biobanks that store a wide variety of human tissue samples, researchers can select samples that best match their study criteria and reduce variability65. In addition, establishing collaborative networks between research institutions, hospitals, and biobanks can improve access to human tissue samples and facilitate the sharing of resources and information. Additionally, funding from government agencies, non-profit organizations, or private-sector partnerships can encourage sharing of expensive resources, such as specialized equipment or reagents, through collaborative agreements or shared facilities. All these measures might help reduce the overall cost burden for individual research groups. By addressing these limitations through strategic collaboration, future researchers can enhance the effectiveness of human models in angiogenesis assays, ultimately leading to more accurate and clinically relevant findings.

Abbreviations

ABPI: Ankle-brachial pressure index; AKT: Ak strain transforming (Protein kinase B); ASP: Ankle systolic pressure; ATP: Adenosine triphosphate; BMSC: Bone marrow-derived stem cell; BrdU: Bromodeoxyuridine; CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD: Coronary artery disease; ECM: Extracellular matrix; EFS: Event free survival; ETT: Exercise treadmill tests; FGFs: Fibroblast growth factors; HAECs: Human aortic endothelial cells; HCAECs: Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells; HMVEC: Human Microvascular Endothelial cells; HSV: Human saphenous veins; HUVECs: Human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells; MMPs: Matrix metalloproteinases; MTT: 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide; NCD: Non-communicable diseases; OOAC: The organ-on-a-chip; PDGF: Platelet-derived growth factor; PFS: Progression-free survival; PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinases; TGFβ: Transforming growth factor beta; VEGF: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Acknowledgments

We would like to appreciation to the financial support provided by the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia through the Fundamental Research Grand Scheme (FRGS), under grant number FRGS/1/2023/SKK06/UKM/02/16.

Author’s contributions

Maisarah was the primary author and was responsible for drafting and editing the manuscript. Nur Najmi, Azizah, and Nadiah provided supervision, critical review, and contributed to manuscript revisions. Mohd Faizal, Safa, and Ishamuddin participated in the review process and provided feedback on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Fundamental Research Grand Scheme (FRGS), under grant number FRGS/1/2023/SKK06/UKM/02/16.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. T.C. Elebiyo, D. Rotimi, I.O. Evbuomwan, R.F. Maimako, M. Iyobhebhe, O.A. Ojo. Reassessing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in anti-angiogenic cancer therapy. Cancer treatment and research communications 2022; 32: 100620.
  2. A.W. Griffioen, A.C. Dudley. The rising impact of angiogenesis research. Angiogenesis 2022; 25(4): 435-7.
  3. D. Ribatti. Judah Folkman, a pioneer in the study of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2008; 11(1): 3-10.
  4. Z.I. Stryker, M. Rajabi, P.J. Davis, S.A. Mousa. Evaluation of Angiogenesis Assays. Biomedicines 2019; 7(2): 37.
  5. A. Kapoor, C.G. Chen, R. V. Iozzo. A simplified aortic ring assay: a useful ex vivo method to assess biochemical and functional parameters of angiogenesis. Matrix biology plus 2020; 6: 100025.
  6. D. Singh, A. Mathur, S. Arora, S. Roy, N. Mahindroo. Journey of organ on a chip technology and its role in future healthcare scenario. Applied Surface Science Advances 2022; 9: 100246.
  7. S.D. Collins, G. Yuen, T. Tu, M.A. Budzinska, K. Spring, K. Bryant. In vitro models of the liver: disease modeling, drug discovery and clinical applications. Exon Publications 2019; 9: 47-67.
  8. S.J. Roper, B. Coyle. Establishing an in vitro 3d spheroid model to study medulloblastoma drug response and tumor dissemination. Current Protocols 2022; 2(1): e357.
  9. P. Kannan, M. Schain, D.P. Lane. An automated quantification tool for angiogenic sprouting from endothelial spheroids. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022; 13: 883083.
  10. . Merck. Tumor spheroid formation assay [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MY/en/technical-documents/protocol/cell-culture-and-cell-culture-analysis/3d-cell-culture/tumor-spheroid-formation-assay. 2024; :
  11. N.S. Nor Hisam, A. Ugusman, N.F. Rajab, K. Di Gregoli, M.F. Ahmad, N.N. Mohamad Anuar. In vitro cell migration, invasion, and adhesion assays: from cell imaging to data analysis. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology 2023; 14: 107.
  12. G. Evyapan, N.C. Senturk, I.S. Celik. Ornidazole Inhibits the Angiogenesis and Migration Abilities of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) via Downregulation of VEGFA/VEGFR2/NRP-1 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathways. Cell biochemistry and biophysics 2024; 82(4): 3277-85.
  13. J. Pijuan, C. Barceló, D.F. Moreno, O. Maiques, P. Sisó, R.M. Marti. In vitro cell migration, invasion, and adhesion assays: from cell imaging to data analysis. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2019; 7: 107.
  14. J. Martí-Clúa. Methods for inferring cell cycle parameters using thymidine analogues. Biology (Basel) 2023; 12(6): 885-5.
  15. X. Joseph, V. Akhil, A. Arathi, P.V. Mohanan. Comprehensive development in organ-on-a-chip technology. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2022; 111(1): 18-31.
  16. D.L. Hughes, A. Hughes, Z. Soonawalla, S. Mukherjee, E. O'neill. Dynamic physiological culture of ex vivo human tissue: a systematic review. Cancers 2021; 13(12): 2870.
  17. S. Hemmilä, M. Ruponen, E. Toropainen, U. Tengvall-Unadike, A. Urtti, P. Kallio. Microflow-based device for in vitro and ex vivo drug permeability studies. SLAS Technology 2020; 25(5): 455-62.
  18. P. Carranza-Rosales, D. Valencia-Mercado, O. Esquivel-Hernández, M.I. González-Geroniz, J.I. Bañuelos-García, A.L. Castruita-Ávila. Breast cancer tissue explants: an approach to develop personalized therapy in public health services. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2023; 13(10): 1521.
  19. S.J. Kim, M.G. Kim, J. Kim, J.S. Jeon, J. Park, H.G. Yi. Bioprinting methods for fabricating in vitro tubular blood vessel models. Cyborg and Bionic Systems (Washington, D.C.) 2023; 4: 0043.
  20. M.R. Maurya, S. Gupta, J.Y. Li, N.E. Ajami, Z.B. Chen, J.Y. Shyy. Longitudinal shear stress response in human endothelial cells to atheroprone and atheroprotective conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2021; 118(4): e2023236118.
  21. H.L. Zhou, X.Z. Jiang, Y. Ventikos. Role of blood flow in endothelial functionality: a review. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2023; 11: 1259280.
  22. D.J. Medina-Leyte, M. Domínguez-Pérez, I. Mercado, M.T. Villarreal-Molina, L. Jacobo-Albavera. Use of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (huvec) as a model to study cardiovascular disease: a review. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland) 2020; 10(3): 938.
  23. S. Lau, M. Gossen, A. Lendlein, F. Jung. Venous and arterial endothelial cells from human umbilical cords: potential cell sources for cardiovascular research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021; 22(2): 978.
  24. H.S. Rahman, B.L. Tan, H.H. Othman, M.S. Chartrand, Y. Pathak, S. Mohan. An Overview of in vitro, in vivo, and computational techniques for cancer-associated angiogenesis studies. BioMed Research International 2020; 2020(1): 2020:8857428.
  25. M.T. Gentile, O. Pastorino, M. Bifulco, L. Colucci-D'Amato. HUVEC tube-formation assay to evaluate the impact of natural products on angiogenesis. Journal of Visualized Experiments 2019; 2019(148): 58591.
  26. S. He, C. Wu, J. Xiao, D. Li, Z. Sun, M. Li. Endothelial extracellular vesicles modulate the macrophage phenotype: potential implications in atherosclerosis. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 2018; 87(4): e12648.
  27. F. Lu, H. Gong, H. Lei, J. Li. Downregulation of cathepsin C alleviates endothelial cell dysfunction by suppressing p38 MAPK/NF-κB pathway in preeclampsia. Bioengineered 2022; 13(2): 3019-28.
  28. I. Kocherova, A. Bryja, P. Mozdziak, A. Angelova Volponi, M. Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, H. Piotrowska-Kempisty. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) co-culture with osteogenic cells: from molecular communication to engineering prevascularised bone grafts. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2019; 8(10): 1602.
  29. I. Campesi, F. Franconi, A. Montella, S. Dessole, G. Capobianco. Human umbilical cord: information mine in sex-specific medicine. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 2021; 11(1): 52.
  30. C. Moccia, M. Cherubini, M. Fortea, A. Akinbote, P. Padmanaban, V. Beltran-Sastre. Mammary microvessels are sensitive to menstrual cycle sex hormones. Advanced Science 2023; 10(35): e2302561.
  31. D. Donnini, G. Perrella, G. Stel, F.S. Ambesi-Impiombato, F. Curcio. A new model of human aortic endothelial cells in vitro. Biochimie 2000; 82(12): 1107-14.
  32. M.L. Adelus, J. Ding, B.T. Tran, A.C. Conklin, A.K. Golebiewski, L.K. Stolze. Single-cell: omic profiles of human aortic endothelial cells in vitro and human atherosclerotic lesions ex vivo reveal heterogeneity of endothelial subtype and response to activating perturbations. eLife 2024; 12:
  33. W.E. Grizzle. Issues in the use of human tissues to support precision medicine. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 2019; 30: 66-78.
  34. M. Lippi, I. Stadiotti, G. Pompilio, E. Sommariva. Human cell modeling for cardiovascular diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020; 21(17): 6388.
  35. S.H. Lee, Y.J. Jeong, J. Park, H.Y. Kim, Y. Son, K.S. Kim. Low-dose radiation affects cardiovascular disease risk in human aortic endothelial cells by altering gene expression under normal and diabetic conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022; 23(15): 8577.
  36. H.R. Seo, H.E. Jeong, H.J. Joo, S.C. Choi, C.Y. Park, J.H. Kim. Intrinsic FGF2 and FGF5 promotes angiogenesis of human aortic endothelial cells in 3D microfluidic angiogenesis system. Scientific reports 2016; 6(1): 28832.
  37. A. Poursaleh, F.S. Beigee, G. Esfandiari, M. Najafi. Adhesion of monocytes and endothelial cells isolated from the human aorta suppresses by miRNA-PEI particles. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2021; 21(1): 395.
  38. A. Ghallab. In vitro test systems and their limitations. EXCLI Journal 2013; 12: 1024-6.
  39. A. Krüger-Genge, A. Blocki, R.P. Franke, F. Jung. Vascular endothelial cell biology: an update. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2019; 20(18): 4411.
  40. D. Shishkova, V. Markova, M. Sinitsky, A. Tsepokina, A. Frolov, N. Zagorodnikov. Co-culture of primary human coronary artery and internal thoracic artery endothelial cells results in mutually beneficial paracrine interactions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020; 21(21): 8032.
  41. S.Y. Yu, Y.M. Song, A.M. Li, X.J. Yu, G. Zhao, M.B. Song. Isolation and characterization of human coronary artery-derived endothelial cells in vivo from patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Journal of vascular research 2009; 46(5): 487-94.
  42. K. Pandian, L. Huang, A. Junaid, A. Harms, A.J. van Zonneveld, T. Hankemeier. Tracer-based metabolomics for profiling nitric oxide metabolites in a 3D microvessels-on-chip model. FASEB Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 2024; 38(16): e70005.
  43. F. Vozzi, A. Cecchettini, M. Cabiati, F. Mg, P. Aretini, S. Del Ry. Modulated molecular markers of restenosis and thrombosis byin-vitrovascular cells exposed to bioresorbable scaffolds. Biomedical Materials 2021; 16(4): ac0401.
  44. K. Lakota, K. Mrak-Poljsak, B. Rozman, S. Sodin-Semrl. Increased responsiveness of human coronary artery endothelial cells in inflammation and coagulation. Mediators of inflammation 2009; 2009(1): 146872.
  45. A. Majewska, K. Wilkus, K. Brodaczewska, C. Kieda. Endothelial cells as tools to model tissue microenvironment in hypoxia-dependent pathologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021; 22(2): 520.
  46. J.U. Wagner, D. Bojkova, M. Shumliakivska, G. Luxán, L. Nicin, G.S. Aslan. Increased susceptibility of human endothelial cells to infections by SARS-CoV-2 variants. Basic Research in Cardiology 2021; 116(1): 42.
  47. H. Wu, Q. Yao, A. Lumsden, C. Chen. Characterization of two populations of human coronary artery endothelial cells(1). The Journal of Surgical Research 2004; 118(1): 38-44.
  48. C.A. Staton, M.W. Reed, N.J. Brown. A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays. International Journal of Experimental Pathology 2009; 90(3): 195-221.
  49. L.R. Smith, G.A. Meyer. Skeletal muscle explants: ex-vivo models to study cellular behavior in a complex tissue environment. Connective Tissue Research 2020; 61(3-4): 248-61.
  50. A. Loewa, J.J. Feng, S. Hedtrich. Human disease models in drug development. Nature Reviews Bioengineering 2023; 1(8): 1-15.
  51. A. Zeybek, M. Ozkan, M. Alpay. Bilateral variations of the great saphenous vein. Marmara Medical Journal 2021; 34(2): 219-21.
  52. L. Luo, Y. Cai, Y. Zhang, C.G. Hsu, V.A. Korshunov, X. Long. Role of PDE10A in vascular smooth muscle cell hyperplasia and pathological vascular remodelling. Cardiovascular Research 2022; 118(12): 2703-17.
  53. D.A. Prim, V. Menon, S. Hasanian, L. Carter, T. Shazly, J.D. Potts. Perfusion tissue culture initiates differential remodeling of internal thoracic arteries, radial arteries, and saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Research 2018; 55(5): 255-67.
  54. K. Bifulco, I. Longanesi-Cattani, M. Gala, G. DI Carluccio, M.T. Masucci, V. Pavone. The soluble form of urokinase receptor promotes angiogenesis through its Ser88‐Arg‐Ser‐Arg‐Tyr92 chemotactic sequence. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010; 8(12): 2789-99.
  55. L.S. Model, M.R. Hall, D.J. Wong, A. Muto, Y. Kondo, K.R. Ziegler. Arterial shear stress reduces eph-b4 expression in adult human veins. The Yale journal of biology and medicine 2014; 87(3): 359.
  56. Y. Cai, W.E. Knight, S. Guo, J.D. Li, P.A. Knight, C. Yan. Vinpocetine suppresses pathological vascular remodeling by inhibiting vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2012; 343(2): 479-88.
  57. D.K. Price, Y. Ando, E.A. Kruger, M. Weiss, W.D. Figg. 5'-OH-thalidomide, a metabolite of thalidomide, inhibits angiogenesis. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2002; 24(1): 104-10.
  58. M.M. Pereira. Equine Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells: Phenotypic Enhancement and Ex vivo Angiogenesis Studies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024; 25(11): 6017.
  59. T. Ramaesh, J.J. Logie, A.K. Roseweir, R.P. Millar, B.R. Walker, P.W.F. Hadoke. Kisspeptin-10 inhibits angiogenesis in human placental vessels ex vivo and endothelial cells in vitro. Endocrinology 2010; 151(12): 5927-34.
  60. G. Seano, L. Primo. Human arterial ring angiogenesis assay. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2016; 1430: 191-203.
  61. K. Ghimire, Y. Li, T. Chiba, S.M. Julovi, J. Li, M.A. Ross. CD47 promotes age-associated deterioration in angiogenesis, blood flow and glucose homeostasis. Cells 2020; 9(7): 1695.
  62. G. Seano, G. Chiaverina, P.A. Gagliardi, L. Di Blasio, R. Sessa, F. Bussolino. Modeling human tumor angiogenesis in a three-dimensional culture system. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology 2013; 121(21): e129-37.
  63. L. O'Neill, P. Rooney, D. Molloy, M. Connolly, J. McCormick, G. McCarthy. Regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis in giant cell arteritis by acute-phase serum amyloid A. Arthritis {&amp;}amp; Rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) 2015; 67(9): 2447-56.
  64. C. Yang, H. Tahiri, C. Cai, M. Gu, C. Gagnon, P. Hardy. microRNA-181a inhibits ocular neovascularization by interfering with vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2018; 36(3): e12329.
  65. A.F. Moleiro, G. Conceição, A.F. Leite-Moreira, A. Rocha-Sousa. A critical analysis of the available in vitro and ex vivo methods to study retinal angiogenesis. Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 2017: 3034953.
  66. N.A. Pesce, F. Plastino, C. Reyes-Goya, J. Bernd, V. Pavone, M. Dal Monte. Mitigation of human iris angiogenesis through uPAR/LRP-1 interaction antagonism in an organotypic ex vivo model. FASEB Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 2024; 38(5): e23533.
  67. N. Popovic, E. Hooker, A. Barabino, A. Flamier, F. Provost, M. Buscarlet. COCO/DAND5 inhibits developmental and pathological ocular angiogenesis. EMBO Molecular Medicine 2021; 13(3): e12005.
  68. R.M. Knott, M. Robertson, E. Muckersie, V.A. Folefac, F.E. Fairhurst, S.M. Wileman. A model system for the study of human retinal angiogenesis: activation of monocytes and endothelial cells and the association with the expression of the monocarboxylate transporter type 1 (MCT-1). Diabetologia 1999; 42(7): 870-7.
  69. Y. Liu, N. Huang, S. Liao, E. Rothzerg, F. Yao, Y. Li. Current research progress in targeted anti‐angiogenesis therapy for osteosarcoma. Cell proliferation 2021; 54(9): e13102.
  70. F. Navid, V.M. Santana, M. Neel, M.B. McCarville, B.L. Shulkin, J. Wu. A phase II trial evaluating the feasibility of adding bevacizumab to standard osteosarcoma therapy. International journal of cancer 2017; 141(7): 1469-77.
  71. F. Bandello, A. Augustin, A. Tufail, R. Leaback. A 12-month, multicenter, parallel group comparison of dexamethasone intravitreal implant versus ranibizumab in branch retinal vein occlusion. European Journal of Ophthalmology 2018; 28(6): 697-705.
  72. P.K. Gupta, P. Shivashankar, M. Rajkumar, S.S. Mahapatra, S.C. Desai, A. Dhar. Label extension, single-arm, phase III study shows efficacy and safety of stempeucel\textregistered in patients with critical limb ischemia due to atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease. Stem Cell Research {&amp;}amp; Therapy 2023; 14(1): 60.
  73. M.B. Atkins, E.R. Plimack, I. Puzanov, M.N. Fishman, D.F. McDermott, D.C. Cho. Axitinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell cancer: a non-randomised, open-label, dose-finding, and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. The Lancet Oncology 2018; 19(3): 405-15.
  74. F.J.S.H. Woei-A-Jin, N.I. Weijl, M.C. Burgmans, A. Fariña Sarasqueta, J.T. van Wezel, M.N.J.M. Wasser. Neoadjuvant treatment with angiogenesis-inhibitor dovitinib prior to local therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II study. The Oncologist 2021; 26(10): 854-64.
  75. J. Hartikainen, I. Hassinen, A. Hedman, A. Kivelä, A. Saraste, J. Knuuti. Adenoviral intramyocardial VEGF-DΔNΔC gene transfer increases myocardial perfusion reserve in refractory angina patients: a phase I/IIa study with 1-year follow-up. European Heart Journal 2017; 38(33): 2547-55.
  76. R.L. Walker. Human and animal subjects of research: the moral significance of respect versus welfare. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2006; 27(4): 305-31.
  77. W.E. Grizzle, W.C. Bell, K.C. Sexton. Issues in collecting, processing and storing human tissues and associated information to support biomedical research. Cancer Biomarkers 2010; 9(1-6): 531-49.
  78. A. Esparza, N. Jimenez, E.A. Borrego, S. Browne, S.L. Natividad-Diaz. Human stem cell-based 3D in vitro angiogenesis models for preclinical drug screening applications. Molecular Biology Reports. 2024; 51(1): 260.

Comments